Total
4356 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-0708 | 2025-02-12 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in fumiao opencms 2.2. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/model/addOrUpdate of the component Add Model Management Page. The manipulation of the argument 模板前缀 leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0530 | 2025-02-12 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in code-projects Job Recruitment 1.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /_parse/_feedback_system.php. The manipulation of the argument type leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22894 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Connect Secure | 2025-02-12 | 8.8 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R11.4 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user via maliciously crafted meeting room. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8218 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2025-02-12 | 7.2 High |
| A code injection vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 that allows an attacker to crafted a URI to perform an arbitrary code execution via the admin web interface. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8243 | 1 Ivanti | 2 Connect Secure, Policy Secure | 2025-02-12 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure < 9.1R8.2 admin web interface could allow an authenticated attacker to upload custom template to perform an arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9822 | 1 Dnnsoftware | 1 Dotnetnuke | 2025-02-12 | 8.8 High |
| DNN (aka DotNetNuke) before 9.1.1 has Remote Code Execution via a cookie, aka "2017-08 (Critical) Possible remote code execution on DNN sites." | ||||
| CVE-2025-0795 | 2025-02-12 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in ESAFENET CDG V5. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file /todolistjump.jsp. The manipulation of the argument flowId leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0800 | 1 Argie | 1 Online Courseware | 2025-02-12 | 2.4 Low |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SourceCodester Online Courseware 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /pcci/admin/saveeditt.php of the component Edit Teacher. The manipulation of the argument fname leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0806 | 1 Anisha | 1 Job Recruitment | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in code-projects Job Recruitment 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file _call_job_search_ajax.php. The manipulation of the argument job_type leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0871 | 2025-02-12 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Maybecms 1.2. This affects an unknown part of the file /mb/admin/index.php?u=article-edit of the component Add Article. The manipulation of the argument data_info[content] leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4810 | 1 Hp | 2 Application Lifecycle Management, Procurve Manager | 2025-02-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP ProCurve Manager (PCM) 3.20 and 4.0, PCM+ 3.20 and 4.0, Identity Driven Manager (IDM) 4.0, and Application Lifecycle Management allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a marshalled object to (1) EJBInvokerServlet or (2) JMXInvokerServlet, aka ZDI-CAN-1760. NOTE: this is probably a duplicate of CVE-2007-1036, CVE-2010-0738, and/or CVE-2012-0874. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1213 | 2025-02-12 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in pihome-shc PiHome 1.77. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /index.php. The manipulation of the argument $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'] leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2859 | 1 Teampass | 1 Teampass | 2025-02-12 | 8.8 High |
| Code Injection in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.9. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10001 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | ||
| A Code Injection vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed attackers to inject malicious code into the query selector via the identity property in the message handling function. This enabled the exfiltration of sensitive data by manipulating the DOM, including authentication tokens. To execute the attack, the victim must be logged into GitHub and interact with the attacker controlled malicious webpage containing the hidden iframe. This vulnerability occurs due to an improper sequence of validation, where the origin check occurs after accepting the user-controlled identity property. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, 3.14.2, and 3.15.0. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1178 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-02-12 | 5.7 Medium |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.6 before 15.9.6, all versions starting from 15.10 before 15.10.5, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.1. File integrity may be compromised when source code or installation packages are pulled from a tag or from a release containing a ref to another commit. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25550 | 1 Schneider-electric | 1 Struxureware Data Center Expert | 2025-02-12 | 7.2 High |
| A CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability exists that allows remote code execution via the “hostname” parameter when maliciously crafted hostname syntax is entered. Affected products: StruxureWare Data Center Expert (V7.9.2 and prior) | ||||
| CVE-2024-52046 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Mina, Apache Camel Spring Boot | 2025-02-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks. This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4. It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the ObjectSerializationCodecFactory class in the filter chain. If your application is specifically using those classes, you have to upgrade to the latest version of MINA core library. Upgrading will not be enough: you also need to explicitly allow the classes the decoder will accept in the ObjectSerializationDecoder instance, using one of the three new methods: /** * Accept class names where the supplied ClassNameMatcher matches for * deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param classNameMatcher the matcher to use */ public void accept(ClassNameMatcher classNameMatcher) /** * Accept class names that match the supplied pattern for * deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param pattern standard Java regexp */ public void accept(Pattern pattern) /** * Accept the wildcard specified classes for deserialization, * unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param patterns Wildcard file name patterns as defined by * {@link org.apache.commons.io.FilenameUtils#wildcardMatch(String, String) FilenameUtils.wildcardMatch} */ public void accept(String... patterns) By default, the decoder will reject *all* classes that will be present in the incoming data. Note: The FtpServer, SSHd and Vysper sub-project are not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1705 | 1 Shopwind | 1 Shopwind | 2025-02-12 | 5.6 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Shopwind up to 4.6. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function actionCreate of the file /public/install/controllers/DefaultController.php of the component Installation. The manipulation leads to code injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-254393 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13472 | 1 Wcproducttable | 1 Woocommerce Product Table | 2025-02-11 | 7.3 High |
| The The WooCommerce Product Table Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.4. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes. The same 'sc_attrs' parameter is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting as well. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7419 | 1 Soflyy | 1 Wp All Export | 2025-02-11 | 8.3 High |
| The WP ALL Export Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.1 via the custom export fields. This is due to the missing input validation and sanitization of user-supplied data. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary PHP code into form fields that get executed on the server during the export, potentially leading to a complete site compromise. As a prerequisite, the custom export field should include fields containing user-supplied data. | ||||