Total
165 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-37011 | 1 Mendix | 1 Saml | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix SAML (Mendix 7 compatible) (All versions < V1.17.0), Mendix SAML (Mendix 8 compatible) (All versions < V2.3.0), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible, New Track) (All versions < V3.3.1), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible, Upgrade Track) (All versions < V3.3.0). Affected versions of the module insufficiently protect from packet capture replay. This could allow unauthorized remote attackers to bypass authentication and get access to the application. For compatibility reasons, fix versions still contain this issue, but only when the not recommended, non default configuration option `'Allow Idp Initiated Authentication'` is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36945 | 1 Mazda | 2 Mazda, Mazda Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) receiving unit on certain Mazda vehicles through 2020 allows remote attackers to perform unlock operations and force a resynchronization after capturing three consecutive valid key-fob signals over the radio, aka a RollBack attack. The attacker retains the ability to unlock indefinitely. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36089 | 1 Kubevela | 1 Kubevela | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| KubeVela is an application delivery platform Users using KubeVela's VelaUX APIServer could be affected by an authentication bypass vulnerability. In KubeVela prior to versions 1.4.11 and 1.5.4, VelaUX APIServer uses the `PlatformID` as the signed key to generate the JWT tokens for users. Another API called `getSystemInfo` exposes the platformID. This vulnerability allows users to use the platformID to re-generate the JWT tokens to bypass the authentication. Versions 1.4.11 and 1.5.4 contain a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33971 | 1 Omron | 104 Nj-pa3001, Nj-pa3001 Firmware, Nj-pd3001 and 101 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Authentication bypass by capture-replay vulnerability exists in Machine automation controller NX7 series all models V1.28 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX1 series all models V1.48 and earlier, and Machine automation controller NJ series all models V 1.48 and earlier, which may allow an adjacent attacker who can analyze the communication between the controller and the specific software used by OMRON internally to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition or execute a malicious program. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33208 | 1 Omron | 113 Na5-12w, Na5-12w Firmware, Na5-15w and 110 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| Authentication bypass by capture-replay vulnerability exists in Machine automation controller NJ series all models V 1.48 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX7 series all models V1.28 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX1 series all models V1.48 and earlier, Automation software 'Sysmac Studio' all models V1.49 and earlier, and Programmable Terminal (PT) NA series NA5-15W/NA5-12W/NA5-9W/NA5-7W models Runtime V1.15 and earlier, which may allow a remote attacker who can analyze the communication between the affected controller and automation software 'Sysmac Studio' and/or a Programmable Terminal (PT) to access the controller. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31277 | 1 Mi | 2 Xiaomi Lamp 1, Xiaomi Lamp 1 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Xiaomi Lamp 1 v2.0.4_0066 was discovered to be vulnerable to replay attacks. This allows attackers to to bypass the expected access restrictions and gain control of the switch and other functions via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31265 | 1 Wargaming | 1 World Of Warships | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| The replay feature in the client in Wargaming World of Warships 0.11.4 allows remote attackers to execute code when a user launches a replay from an untrusted source. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31158 | 1 Packback | 1 Lti 1.3 Tool Library | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| LTI 1.3 Tool Library is a library used for building IMS-certified LTI 1.3 tool providers in PHP. Prior to version 5.0, the Nonce Claim Value was not being validated against the nonce value sent in the Authentication Request. Users should upgrade to version 5.0 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30467 | 1 Joyebike | 2 Wolf 2022, Wolf 2022 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| Joy ebike Wolf Manufacturing year 2022 is vulnerable to Denial of service, which allows remote attackers to jam the key fob request via RF. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30466 | 1 Joybike | 2 Wolf, Wolf Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| joyebike Joy ebike Wolf Manufacturing year 2022 is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2780 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to use the Git Connectivity test function on the VCS project to initiate an SMB request resulting in the potential for an NTLM relay attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2226 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 4 Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| An OpenPGP digital signature includes information about the date when the signature was created. When displaying an email that contains a digital signature, the email's date will be shown. If the dates were different, then Thunderbird didn't report the email as having an invalid signature. If an attacker performed a replay attack, in which an old email with old contents are resent at a later time, it could lead the victim to believe that the statements in the email are current. Fixed versions of Thunderbird will require that the signature's date roughly matches the displayed date of the email. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 102 and Thunderbird < 91.11. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29878 | 1 Siemens | 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P850 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00), SICAM P855 (All versions < V3.00). Affected devices use a limited range for challenges that are sent during the unencrypted challenge-response communication. An unauthenticated attacker could capture a valid challenge-response pair generated by a legitimate user, and request the webpage repeatedly to wait for the same challenge to reappear for which the correct response is known. This could allow the attacker to access the management interface of the device. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29593 | 1 Dingtian-tech | 2 Dt-r004, Dt-r004 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| relay_cgi.cgi on Dingtian DT-R002 2CH relay devices with firmware 3.1.276A allows an attacker to replay HTTP post requests without the need for authentication or a valid signed/authorized request. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29475 | 1 Goabode | 2 Iota All-in-one Security Kit, Iota All-in-one Security Kit Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the XFINDER functionality of Abode Systems, Inc. iota All-In-One Security Kit 6.9X and 6.9Z. A specially-crafted man-in-the-middle attack can lead to increased privileges. An attacker can perform a man-in-the-middle attack to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29334 | 1 H Project | 1 H | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in H v1.0 allows attackers to bypass authentication via a session replay attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27254 | 1 Honda | 2 Civic 2018, Civic 2018 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| The remote keyless system on Honda Civic 2018 vehicles sends the same RF signal for each door-open request, which allows for a replay attack, a related issue to CVE-2019-20626. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25838 | 1 Laravel | 1 Fortify | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| Laravel Fortify before 1.11.1 allows reuse within a short time window, thus calling into question the "OT" part of the "TOTP" concept. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25837 | 1 Bluetooth | 1 Bluetooth Core Specification | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Bluetooth® Pairing in Bluetooth Core Specification v1.0B through v5.3 may permit an unauthenticated MITM to acquire credentials with two pairing devices via adjacent access when at least one device supports BR/EDR Secure Connections pairing and the other BR/EDR Legacy PIN code pairing if the MITM negotiates BR/EDR Secure Simple Pairing in Secure Connections mode using the Passkey association model with the pairing Initiator and BR/EDR Legacy PIN code pairing with the pairing Responder and brute forces the Passkey entered by the user into the Responder as a 6-digit PIN code. The MITM attacker can use the identified PIN code value as the Passkey value to complete authentication with the Initiator via Bluetooth pairing method confusion. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25836 | 1 Bluetooth | 1 Bluetooth Core Specification | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Bluetooth® Low Energy Pairing in Bluetooth Core Specification v4.0 through v5.3 may permit an unauthenticated MITM to acquire credentials with two pairing devices via adjacent access when the MITM negotiates Legacy Passkey Pairing with the pairing Initiator and Secure Connections Passkey Pairing with the pairing Responder and brute forces the Passkey entered by the user into the Initiator. The MITM attacker can use the identified Passkey value to complete authentication with the Responder via Bluetooth pairing method confusion. | ||||